Terrorism sensors: A national challenge

City officials are concerned that building owners are purchasing sham equipment that will send false alarms to police, fire and other first responders. They are right to be concerned. Yet, proliferation of disparate local regulation is not the answer. Every city faces the same concerns. The solution lies, therefore, with consistent standards, applicable to all.

At this time, the federal government, which is the primary sponsor of sensor research, supports many companies who compete to develop more effective sensors and diagnostic tools. As a purchaser, the federal government has adopted strict standards, but these standards do not apply to sensor companies selling to private or local government property owners.

Clearly, terror attacks are not limited to government assets. Sports stadiums, office towers, and large events are all potential targets of concern that do not fall under government control. Sensible use of technologies that monitor ventilation, mail or other systems should be encouraged among owners and operators of these facilities.  

A string of local legislation only serves to smother an infant industry (and its related science) that cities will be increasingly in need of in the coming decades. Instead, local officials in San Francisco and other major cities should jointly appeal for national standards. Especially important will be open collaboration with the private-sector.  Standard setting for these devices is a necessary and inevitable development. Responsible sensor manufacturers will welcome guidelines that facilitate national marketing and strengthen local government confidence.

Brent Davidson, J.D. is the Director of Program Development, and head of ISBI’s Washington, DC office.  Barry Kellman is the President of ISBI and Professor of International Law at DePaul College of Law.