The Tea Party’s false steps

The Tea Party movement is marginalizing itself with its actions in Delaware.

The movement has been enormously influential and effective because it has been
clearly defined by fiscal and small-government issues that cut a wide swath
through the electorate. In Delaware, the Tea Party is making a significant
departure from the very set of core issues that has drawn in a broad spectrum
of voters and new voters, and instead seems to be defining itself by issues
such as abortion and gun rights.

This is why many Tea Party supporters will likely start to move away from
association with the movement. (That, and those pesky personal issues and
strange positions of O’Donnell’s that should disqualify her as an
endorsed candidate of any party or movement, regardless of her stated positions
on primary issues.)

The Tea Party is still, undoubtedly, a net gain for the Republican Party, but there
has been a price to pay. Christine O’Donnell’s support by the Tea Party
movement does not even remotely reflect the Tea Party support for candidates
such as Scott Brown in Massachusetts. But like many effective movements, the
Tea Party may be enjoying a brief but bright shelf life, meant to burn hot
for a short time before flickering out — or at least settling into a lesser
long-term role.

If the Tea Party tanks Mike Castle in Delaware and costs the Republicans the
Senate, it will lose supporters in droves.

Visit www.CapitolStrategiesPR.com.