The Military

Selective Disservice

Quick. Let’s review the choices. What can be done to prevent our all-volunteer armed forces from being “stretched and stressed” beyond the breaking point? 

We can:

There are  arguments for a draft — variations on Rep. Charles Rangel’s (D-N.Y.) contention that it would more equitably spread the pain of U.S. adventurism. Now the  well-off would be required to  carry a burden, not those who just need the job. The patriotic could still volunteer, but the less motivated would also have to pay a price, no matter how privileged. Maybe this time we can do away with the college deferments and the other silver-spoon evasions.

That would also possibly rein in the instinct to use war cavalierly as a political campaign strategy.

Most of the wealthy aren’t about to let their children march into harm’s way in some far-off inferno. They would probably keep them close, so they could help with family projects like … uh … Daddy running for president. Stuff like that.

And there’s one other consideration. If there is a draft, all hell will break loose. No longer would the ranks of today’s anti-war demonstrations be filled mainly by boomers reliving their youths and singing Peter, Paul and Mary songs.

We’d return to the good old days all right. The marchers would probably be younger and more violent. And they would have to build a very high fence on the U.S. border to keep the hordes of fleeing Americans out of Canada.

Get ready for it. The draft. The big D. Which rhymes with C. Which stands for the con that we’re not going to have one again. It’s hard to see any other choice.