Story at a glance
- Researchers used artificial intelligence-based language analysis to evaluate the diversity statement at each company on the Fortune 500 list.
- They found that 80 percent of companies had a business-case reason for their commitment, while messaging at 5 percent of the companies was driven by a fairness justification.
- The researchers then conducted five experiments asking LGBTQ professionals, female STEM-job seekers and Black students how business-case diversity statements contributed to their desire to work at a company, as well as how welcome they would feel.
Diversity messages focused on a company’s bottom line run the risk of alienating diverse potential employees, according to a new study.
Researchers used artificial intelligence-based language analysis to evaluate the diversity statement at each company on the Fortune 500 list. They found that 80 percent of companies had a business-case reason for their commitment, while messaging at 5 percent of the companies was driven by a fairness justification. The remaining companies on the list provided no diversity statement or no reason for their statements.
“These business-case justifications are extremely popular,” lead author Oriane Georgeac, a professor at the Yale School of Management, said in a news release. “But our findings suggest that they do more harm than good.”
The researchers then conducted five experiments asking LGBTQ professionals, female STEM-job seekers and Black students how business-case diversity statements contributed to their desire to work at a company as well as how welcome they would feel.
America is changing faster than ever! Add Changing America to your Facebook or Twitter feed to stay on top of the news.
They concluded that business-oriented diversity statements had a negative effect on both the groups’ desire to work at a particular company and their expected feeling of belonging when compared to diversity statements based on fairness.
“On the surface, this rhetoric may sound positive,” Georgeac said, referring to business-case justifications. “However, we argue that by uniquely tying specific social identities to specific workplace contributions, business-case justifications for diversity justify the fact that organizations may attend to individuals’ social identities when forming expectations about, and evaluating, their work.”
“In other words, business-case justifications confirm to women and underrepresented group members that they must worry about their social identities being a lens through which their contributions will be judged, Georgeac continued. “And this is threatening to these groups.”
The team said further research could focus on how business-case diversity statements affect other unrepresented groups and how a company’s public posture compares to how it operates internally.
The study was published in the American Psychological Association’s Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
READ MORE STORIES FROM CHANGING AMERICA
CITY OF AUSTIN PREPARES TO DECRIMINALIZE ABORTION IF ROE V. WADE IS STRUCK DOWN
CARSON DALY SAYS HE’S IN A ‘MUCH BETTER PLACE’ AFTER TALKING ABOUT ANXIETY ATTACKS
HERE ARE THE STATES WHERE YOU CAN (AND CANNOT) CHANGE YOUR GENDER DESIGNATION ON OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS
LIA THOMAS: ‘TRANS WOMEN ARE NOT A THREAT TO WOMEN’S SPORTS’
HOW BUYING A HOME IS CHANGING IN AMERICA
changing america copyright.
