Attorney General: ‘We need not cower in the face of this enemy’

Attorney General Eric Holder on Wednesday vigorously defended his
decision to try five terrorist suspects in civilian courts, arguing New
York City is the venue “most likely to obtain justice for the American
people.”

Holder
vowed that the U.S. would not surrender to fear or politics in seeking
justice in federal court for the alleged Sept. 11 plotters.

{mosads}“We
need not cower in the face of this enemy,” Holder told the Senate
Judiciary Committee at a packed hearing. “Our institutions are strong,
our infrastructure is sturdy, our resolve is firm and our people are
ready.”

Holder’s testimony marks the first time senators have
had a chance to question him publicly since the Department of Justice
last week announced it would try Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the
self-described mastermind behind the Sept. 11 attacks, and four other
suspects now held at Guantánamo Bay.

The decision was seen
as a key turning point for the prison camp, which President Barack
Obama had vowed to close by Jan. 22. Obama in several interviews on
Wednesday acknowledged that deadline would not be met, though Holder
testified that he expected the facility to be closed sometime next
year.

Republicans on the panel grilled Holder over the
decision, which they said could allow a detainee to be released on a
technicality within the U.S.

Several Republicans have also
argued the trials will hand terrorism suspects the high-profile public
attention they crave and make Manhattan a bigger target for terrorism.

“We
are making bad history here,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a
military lawyer and primary author of legislation creating military
commissions to try detainees. He said Holder was jeopardizing national
security by determining that wartime combatants, potentially even Osama
bin Laden, could be given constitutional legal protections usually
provided only to U.S. citizens and foreigners convicted of regular
crimes, not acts of war.

“The big problem I have is that you’re criminalizing the war … I think you’ve made a fundamental mistake here,” Graham said.

Holder
delivered a point-by-point rebuttal to his critics. The defendants
could be tried in either military or civilian court, he said, because
the Sept. 11 attacks were both an act of war and a violation of federal
criminal law.

He defended the record of civilian courts in
handling international and domestic terrorists, and argued Mohammed
would have no more of a platform to “spew his hateful ideology” in a
civilian court in Manhattan than he has already done in a pre-trial
hearings in the military courts.

“I’m not scared of what
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has to say at trial, and no one else needs to be
afraid either,” Holder said, adding that he was certain that judges
could maintain courtroom decorum.

In several tense exchanges,
Holder insisted he is not doing anything that would undermine military
and intelligence officers working to prevent another terrorist attack
and to win the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. He also tried to dispel
“misinformation” he said had surfaced since Friday’s announcement.

“I know that we are at war,” Holder said in his opening statement and repeated in subsequent remarks.

“I
know that we are at war with a vicious enemy who targets our soldiers
on the battlefield in Afghanistan and our civilians on the streets here
at home.

“I have personally witnessed that somber fact in
the faces of the families who have lost loved ones abroad, and I have
seen it in the daily intelligence stream I review each day. Those who
suggest otherwise are simply wrong,” Holder said.

He said he
would use every “instrument of our national power” to bring justice to
those responsible for terrorist attacks. One of the main reasons to try
Mohammed and the other four suspects in civilian courts, he said, was
to finally achieve justice for the victims of the Sept. 11 attacks.

“No more delays,” he said. “It is time — it is past time — to act.”

Sen.
Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), the ranking member of the Judiciary panel,
invited four family members of Sept. 11 victims to the hearing and
introduced them by name in his opening remarks. He accused the
administration of returning to a “pre-9/11 mentality” in making a
series of national security decisions, including trying Mohammed and
four others in civilian courts.

“On Sept. 11, 2001, our
nation was attacked by a savage gang of terrorists whose intent was to
kill innocent Americans and bring ruin to the United States,” Sessions
said. “The devastation they caused in New York, Pennsylvania and at the
Pentagon was an act of war.”

Sessions said he feared that
“time has dulled the memories” of those who support the
administration’s decision to transfer the detainees to the U.S. for
trial.

Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.)
repeatedly defended Holder. He cited letters from survivors of the
Sept. 11 attacks and prominent military officials, such as former
Secretary of State Colin Powell, who support trying the suspects in
civilian courts.

“They committed murder in the United
States, and we’ll seek justice here in the United States and will
prosecute them in our country,” Leahy said. “We’re the most powerful
nation on earth and we have a justice system that is the envy of the
world. We are not afraid. We will go forward and prosecute them.”

Sen.
Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who chairs the Intelligence panel and sits
on Judiciary, said she “fully” supports Holder’s decision.

“I
happen to believe that our federal courts are our finest, our federal
judges the best,” she said. “In my service on the Intelligence
Committee, I’ve watched the failure of the military commissions for
seven years to reach conclusions. Only three cases have been tried.”

After
the hearing, Sen. Kit Bond (R-Mo.), the ranking member of the
Intelligence panel, blasted Holder for dismissing concerns that the
justice system could preclude interrogations of Osama bin Laden if he
were captured.

Under Graham’s questioning, Holder refused
to say whether bin Laden would be given Miranda warnings upon capture,
simply claiming that “the case against him is so overwhelming” that
there would be no need for any statements he might make after capture.

“It’s
stunning that the attorney general seems to have no interest in
obtaining valuable intelligence from bin Laden, who as the leader of al
Qaeda clearly has considerable knowledge of the network, its members,
methods and potential plots to kill more Americans,” Bond said in a
statement.

This story was updated at 9:00 p.m.