The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill

Time does not erase the tragedy of the financial crisis


Mark Twain once said humor is equal to tragedy plus time. But it is far too soon for any part of the great financial crisis tragedy to be funny.

Likewise, it’s far too soon to start dismantling key systemic protections of Dodd-Frank, which is what seems to be happening with proposals made in April by the Federal Reserve and the Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).

{mosads}Perhaps 10 years on, it is easier to forget $11 trillion was lost in the stock market, and another $7 trillion was lost by homeowners. Eleven million homeowners went “upside down” with their mortgages.

  

Fifteen million people were out of work and unemployment soared to over 10 percent. The government spent, lent or guaranteed more than $20 trillion. We should not be laughing at this tragedy by softening systemic protections.

Bank capital ratio changes

The proposals made by the Fed and the OCC will increase leverage in the banking system. Here, in their own words, are key parts of the proposal to the Board of Governors:

The Systemic Risk Council (SRC), which the CFA Institute created and now funds, responded to these proposals with a comment letter that lays out the dangers.

 

In short, regulators arguably should be strengthening, not weakening, the equity base of banks and should be doing so in the simplest way, i.e., via the leverage ratio.

Lowering the leverage ratio is reminiscent of former Citigroup CEO Charles Prince telling the Financial Times in July 2007 — ominously close to the top of the market — that his bank will keep dancing.

Volcker rule changes

Regulators also propose to relax the so-called Volcker Rule that prohibits banks from being hedge funds and engaging in proprietary trading. The excuse for the unwind is that it is too complex and costly for smaller, community banks and that even the biggest, systemically risky banks have learned their lesson and will be more careful now.

The SRC notes that the principle underlying the so-called Volcker Rule is that banks and their affiliated dealers were given access to Fed liquidity insurance and FDIC deposit insurance backed ultimately by taxpayers.

When the businesses of speculative and highly leveraged trading inside these banks got out of control, the taxpayers were forced to bailout depository institutions through TARP and other bailout tools.

The Volcker Rule said enough! Such commercial activities should not be covered under a government safety net. In our view, they present a real risk that we return to a speculative and leveraged trading environment within depository institutions. Here is a summary of the concerns laid out by the SRC:

While a review of 10-year-old regulations for efficiency, effectiveness and cost is desirable, acting like the underlying systemic risks have vanished is a mistake. It is also a mistake to believe the commercial interests trying to convince us the protections are no longer necessary and impinging on economic growth.  

It is indisputable we are at record-levels of corporate profitability, including banks, and the markets have responded in kind. Has time turned financial tragedy into humor, or are we back at levels demanding a laser focus on systemic resilience? We aren’t laughing.

Kurt Schacht is the managing director of the Advocacy division of the CFA Institute, a global association of investment professionals.