The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill

America’s interventionist foreign policy continues to destabilize the world

AP Photo/Mosa'ab Elshamy
American F16 fighter jets land in an airbase for the African Lion military exercise, in Ben Guerir, Morocco, Monday, June 14, 2021.

The U.S. government has over 750 military bases in at least 80 countries and deeply involves itself in all of the world’s major conflicts, most recently in Eastern Europe and the Middle East. But there have recently been notable calls for the U.S. to do even more.

Following the death of Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi in a helicopter crash, both the Wall Street Journal editorial board and Yorktown Institute Senior Fellow Shay Khatiri, in separate articles, brazenly argued that the U.S. ought to help overthrow the Iranian regime. 

On the European front, American diplomat Victoria Nuland urged the government to help Ukraine strike inside Russian territory — and Biden recently announced that he will do just that.

These calls for escalation in major geopolitical conflicts are consistent with our country’s enduring, hawkish status quo. But America urgently needs a foreign policy reckoning before our government catalyzes even worse geopolitical instability. 

Our interventionist foreign policy has not historically been a stabilizing force throughout the world, but rather has often served as a destabilizing wrecking ball, leading to harm overseas and at home. 

In the late 1970s and ’80s, the U.S. funneled money to rebels in Afghanistan, including Islamist extremists, to fight the Soviet Union. While those fighters expelled Russian influence, they later turned on each other. In the struggle for power, a number of those rebels ultimately formed the Taliban and al-Qaeda, who carried out the 9/11 attacks.

Following 9/11, America spent over $8 trillion in taxpayer dollars on wars in the Middle East; lost thousand of troops and killed hundreds of thousands of civilians; and violated Americans’ Fourth Amendment rights by spying on their electronic communications.

It is astonishing that some still want the U.S. to further meddle in the Middle East. Our country has already played kingmaker in Iran. We should not be seeking to do that again.

In 1953, the U.S. helped overthrow the elected leader of Iran, Mohammad Mosaddegh, who opposed British oil companies operating in the country. The West feared Mosaddegh had Communist leanings that might push him to support the Soviets. Following the coup, the U.S. installed the Shah, a brutal dictator, because he was loyal to the West.

Decades of the Shah’s repressive rule inspired hatred toward America that culminated in the Iran hostage crisis. A general uprising of Iranian citizens led to the Shah’s ouster; the government was then replaced by the theocratic Islamic Republic that some want the U.S. to overthrow today.

America’s foreign policy establishment cares very little about democracy abroad. In their eyes, loyalty to the West trumps all. 

Instead of seeking to bring about more regime change in the Middle East, our leaders should heed the words of former Rep. Ron Paul, who said in 2008 that terrorists “don’t come here and attack us because we’re rich and we’re free. They come and they attack us because we’re over there.”

The U.S. also played an integral role in the events that lead to the devastating war between Russia and Ukraine. Despite the fall of the Soviet Union, NATO endured and expanded eastward, which even George Kennan, one of the formulators of U.S. Cold War policy, warned would be “a tragic mistake” that would provoke “a bad reaction from Russia.” 

For over a decade now, against the warnings of former ambassador to Russia and current CIA Director William Burns, the U.S. has openly advocated for Ukrainian entry into NATO, a hard red line for Russia.

Even though meddling in Ukraine was unacceptable to the Russians, the U.S. went as far as to support a coup to overthrow the elected president of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovych, in 2014 after he announced that he would sign an economic deal with Russia instead of the E.U. This directly led to war between the two Eastern European nations.

Then, according to NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, Russia sent NATO a draft treaty in 2021, requiring NATO to promise to abandon any future plans of expansion as a precondition to not invading Ukraine. The West refused. Only then did Russia invade. The invasion, while reprehensible, certainly did not come out of nowhere. 

Instead of continuing to send billions more to Ukraine and helping them strike inside Russian territory, the U.S. should reconsider its involvement in Eastern Europe altogether. Without American meddling, the current war — and all of the death and destruction it has brought — would likely never have occurred.

Every day the United States tries to police the world. While doing so, the government tells Americans that our country is an unalloyed force for good on the global stage, fighting for democracy, making life better for the citizens of foreign nations and securing a safer world for all. This, we are told, justifies our hawkish stance and our proclivity to meddle in foreign affairs.

But our track record flies in the face of these proclamations. American interventionism has led to needless death, destruction, geopolitical instability, increased animosity toward the West, wasted taxpayer dollars and the erosion of our citizen’s constitutional rights.

The U.S. needs to reverse course immediately and adopt a noninterventionist foreign policy.

Benjamin Ayanian is a contributor and Human Respect Fellow for Young Voices.

Tags american foreign policy interventionism Cold War Ebrahim Raisi Foreign policy Iran Joe Biden Ron Paul Russia Ukraine Victoria Nuland Viktor Yanukovych

Copyright 2024 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed..

 

Main Area Top ↴

Testing Homepage Widget

 

Main Area Middle ↴
Main Area Bottom ↴

Most Popular

Load more

Video

See all Video