Solar industry already a boon
The Sept. 9 letter to the editor, “Finding balance between heating our homes and preserving Earth,” points out that we don’t need to choose between jobs and clean air. The fledgling solar industry already provides more jobs than the coal industry and job creation in renewable energy is 10 times faster than in the economy overall.
The Solutions Project website has economic projections of the tens of thousands of clean energy jobs that will be created in each state by going 100 percent renewable. These are “40-year jobs” — lifetime employment in both skilled and unskilled positions. The same website also shows the projected savings in healthcare from prevention of asthma attacks and other illnesses caused by carbon pollution.
{mosads}And there’s a way we can transition to clean energy that can be essentially free, create millions of U.S. jobs while making much faster and bigger emissions cuts than the Environmental Protection Agency, without any government regulations or expenditures.
It’s called “carbon fee and dividend,” or CFD. British Columbia passed CFD legislation years ago and it’s been a success. The Citizens’ Climate Lobby is a national volunteer organization whose members are Republicans, Democrats and Independents, all working to get this market-based plan passed in Congress.
CFD gives all the money collected from a steadily increasing carbon pollution fee on fossil fuels to consumers, rather than the government, in monthly amounts. The fee increases annually, so people use their carbon fee rebates to buy cheaper clean energy. The ordinary consumer has more money in pocket each year. Critically, a similar rebated fee would go on imports from countries like China that have higher emissions, cutting emissions there while bringing back manufacturing jobs here. This is a much simpler, fairer, more transparent, effective and efficient way to cut greenhouse gas emissions than cap and trade, and the benefits to our economy will be enormous.
From Lynn Goldfarb, Los Angeles
Not all GOP against Iran deal
On Friday, GOP House members celebrated the fact they rejected the White House’s agreement with Iran.
Here’s what I don’t get.
Colin Powell, former secretary of State, recently joined a respected group of Republican proponents of the agreement. These include former Sen. Dick Lugar (R-Ind.), who served as chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee; Brent Scowcroft, a veteran national security adviser to several Republican presidents, who also served as the chairman of George W. Bush’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board; and former Sen. John Warner (R-Va.), a former chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee. If the GOP leadership in the House consulted with these experts, then why did they vote to reject the deal? And if they didn’t consult with them, why not?
From Denny Freidenrich, Laguna Beach, Calif.
Rookies couldn’t be more different
In many ways, Dr. Ben Carson is an anti-Donald Trump (“Carson, Trump ready for battle of outsiders,” Sept. 15). Trump sits beside Narcissus on the bank of a lake, falling in love with his reflection. Carson is reflective — about his life, his country, his religion and his world. He is quick to share his remarkable success with the remarkable society that gave his gifts a chance to express themselves, while Trump praises only himself and does so unceasingly, apparently unaware of how divisive he is when hurling insults at all in his path.
In one way, however, they are similar. They are both beginners in electoral politics, prone to rookie mistakes and not yet ready for prime time.
From Paul Bloustein, Cincinnati
Copyright 2024 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed..