78 lawmakers vote to sustain Obama veto

Eighteen Republicans joined 60 Democrats on Wednesday to vote to uphold President Obama’s veto of a bill allowing the families of Sept. 11 victims to sue Saudi Arabia.

In the Senate, only Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) moved in support of the president’s veto — although shortly after the vote, 28 senators sent a letter urging the bill’s crafters to address specific “unintended consequences” of the legislation.

{mosads}In the House, five of the Republican votes to sustain came from committee chairmen: Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes (Calif.), Rules Chairman Pete Sessions (Texas), Armed Services Chairman Mac Thornberry (Texas) and Workforce Committee Chairman John Kline (Minn.).

Only one member of House Democratic leadership voted to sustain the president’s veto: Rep. Jim Clyburn (S.C.).

All of the other members in the top ranks of House Democratic leadership found themselves on opposite sides of the president: Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (Md.) and Caucus Chairman Xavier Becerra (Calif.).

Pelosi had previously announced last week she’d vote to override Obama’s veto, providing political cover for many other House Democrats to follow suit.

Four of the nay votes came from Armed Services members — Thornberry, Kline and Reps. Mike Conaway (R-Texas) and Vicky Hartzler (R-Mo.).

Thornberry late last week came out in opposition of the measure, warning that it could open up U.S. military, intelligence and diplomatic personnel to retributive lawsuits in other nations.

While some Republican nays cited their military districts, others who represent heavy military areas, like Rep. Randy Forbes (Va.), voted to override the veto.

While Thornberry’s warning was not enough to change the tide, several Republicans cited the concern as the driver behind their vote to sustain.

“While I sympathize deeply with the efforts of families of 9/11 victims to seek justice in the courts, I could not support this bill because of the serious risk that foreign nations will respond with efforts to prosecute U.S. service members and members of the intelligence community,” Nunes said in a statement.

“I voted to sustain the veto because I believe the legislation could increase risk for our troops, intelligence gatherers, and diplomats serving the U.S. around the world,” Kline said in a statement.

That concern is the same “unintended consequence” highlighted by both Republican and Democratic senators in their Wednesday afternoon letter to the bill’s co-authors, Sens. John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.).

It also echoes Obama’s criticisms of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA).

The White House has campaigned fiercely against the bill, warning that it will undermine longstanding principles of sovereign immunity that protect U.S. government and officials without improving the U.S.’s ability to respond to terrorist attacks.

“Other countries could attempt to use JASTA to justify the creation of similar exceptions to immunity targeted against U.S policies and activities they oppose,” Obama wrote in a Tuesday letter to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Reid.

“The consequences of JASTA could be devastating to the Department of Defense and its service members — and there is no doubt that the consequences could be equally significant for our foreign affairs and intelligence communities.”

No lawmakers from New York or New Jersey voted “nay,” nor did any vulnerable Democrats.

Schumer, the legislation’s co-author, is expected to be the next Senate Democratic leader starting in 2017.